The graph below shows the number of visitors to two tourist destinations in Italy from 2005 to 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph gives information about how many tourists went to two places in Italy between 2005 and 2015. Overall, both figures experienced an upward trend. Moreover, there were more people who would like to spend time in National Park than explore National Museum.
In 2005, the number of visitors to the National Park and National Museum was 30 thousand and around 24 thousand, respectively. Over the next five years, whilst the number of people who went to the National Museum underwent a consecutive fluctuation, the number of tourists to National Park stayed unchanged till 2007 then suffering a dramatic increase, followed by a noticeable decline to 15 thousand in 2020.
From this point onwards, by 2013, more and more citizens were interested in visiting both National Park and National Museum. After that, while the number of visitors to the National Museum continued its upward streak and reached 45 thousand, there was a moderate fall of 15 thousand in the figure for National Park.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In the past most people used to travel to their place of work With increased use of computers the internet and smartphones more and more people are starting to work from home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 61
- Open plan office no walls no barriers Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08536585366 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57022140536 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9948238224 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113743318708 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642771677275 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777437491367 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881692193877 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385298899515 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.