The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades.

A breakdown of the percentage of student accommodation preferences between 1960 and 2000 is depicted in the bar chart.

Overall, the most noticeable changes were the figure for room in a flat and in another family’s house. Meanwhile, hall of residence number showed fluctuations, and the proportion of students living with their parents decreased slightly.

In 1960s, the percentages of students staying in a shared house and a host family were almost twofold (35) compared with the numbers of hall residence and own family (15%). By 2000s, the percentage of students living in a flat had risen dramatically to slightly under three-quarter with by far the highest. In contrast, the figure for living in a host house declined sharply with a very small percent.

In three decades, the proportions of living with a host family and own family decreased to one in ten in each decade and to one in twenty in the former and later. However, the percentage of room in a flat experienced a rapid increase with 65% in 1990s. Another trend was found on the figure for students hall of residence with fluctuated in the range of 20% or 15%.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-05 hannah14032002 27 view
2023-01-05 hannah14032002 11 view
2022-09-15 trachanhkhongmat 82 view
2022-09-15 trachanhkhongmat 73 view
2022-09-15 trachanhkhongmat 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'In the 1960s'.
Suggestion: In the 1960s
...th their parents decreased slightly. In 1960s, the percentages of students staying in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...t experienced a rapid increase with 65% in 1990s. Another trend was found on the figure ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91191709845 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8750827994 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507772020725 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1108747034 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166657490417 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738290813989 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342318120581 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109136023541 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015996478668 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.