The graph below shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012.
The graph illustrates the proportion of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012.
Overall, it can be seen that the proportion of males and females was almost equal in the faculty of medicine whereas there was a huge difference in the percentage of the engineering field.
It is observed that 55% of females were academic staff in the arts faculty which exceeded males by 10%. By contrast, the male percentage was two times of proportion of females in the case of the business field. In the education faculty, the staff percentage of men was one-third of the women percentage where women were 75%. The staff proportion of males in the engineering field was found to be 85% but only 15% were female. There was a difference of 20% between academic staff by gender in the faculty of law where females occupied 60%. A slight difference of 2% was observed in medicine faculty between staff members. Observation of a greater proportion of males was noticed rather than females, here males lagged by 30% and females were 70%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-10 | Angina | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-13 | Angina | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-05 | shaimaa elyamny | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-23 | sonia 7022 | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-28 | thatfrostbyte | 73 | view |
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 67
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 56
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as s source of household energy in many countries around the world Why is this What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy 67
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a students performance Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 2010 in a particular country 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...% of females were academic staff in the arts faculty which exceeded males by 10%. By...
^^^^
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...les lagged by 30% and females were 70%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82608695652 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66636882001 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467391304348 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2847077298 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386670099417 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197290298413 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180606354241 0.0843802449381 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359702960681 0.15604864568 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.239656849484 0.0819641961636 292% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.