The graph below shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012.

The graph illustrates the proportion of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012.
Overall, it can be seen that the proportion of males and females was almost equal in the faculty of medicine whereas there was a huge difference in the percentage of the engineering field.
It is observed that 55% of females were academic staff in the arts faculty which exceeded males by 10%. By contrast, the male percentage was two times of proportion of females in the case of the business field. In the education faculty, the staff percentage of men was one-third of the women percentage where women were 75%. The staff proportion of males in the engineering field was found to be 85% but only 15% were female. There was a difference of 20% between academic staff by gender in the faculty of law where females occupied 60%. A slight difference of 2% was observed in medicine faculty between staff members. Observation of a greater proportion of males was noticed rather than females, here males lagged by 30% and females were 70%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-10 Angina 67 view
2022-10-13 Angina 56 view
2021-05-05 shaimaa elyamny 78 view
2020-12-23 sonia 7022 84 view
2020-10-28 thatfrostbyte 73 view
Essays by user Angina :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...% of females were academic staff in the arts faculty which exceeded males by 10%. By...
^^^^
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...les lagged by 30% and females were 70%.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, third, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82608695652 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66636882001 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467391304348 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2847077298 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386670099417 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197290298413 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180606354241 0.0843802449381 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359702960681 0.15604864568 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.239656849484 0.0819641961636 292% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.