The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of moviegoers in a European country in a week in the years of 2003, 2005 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the majority of citizens in that country went to cinemas at weekends. We can also see that a shift towards movie-going more frequently by the end of the 4-year period.
In each of the years, approximately 75% of people in that country went to cinemas on Saturday and Sunday. Roughly 10 to 15% of citizens reported watching at cinemas on Monday and Wednesday, while around 15 to 20% of people went on Tuesday and Thursday.
Between 2003 and 2007, the proportion of people who watched films at movie theatres at weekends rose by almost 3%, except for the sudden rise of 5% in 2005. Besides, it seems that cinemas received more customers on Saturday than on Sunday, with a higher rate of 10%. While the percentage of moviegoers on Friday maintained unchanged at 30% in 3 years, considerate changes were witnessed on other days. In fact, the percentages of moviegoers on both Tuesday and Thursday experienced a moderate drop of 3% before climbing again to 18% at the end of the period. On the contrary, a significant sink of 8% from 16% in 2003 to 8% in 2007 was recorded on Tuesday.
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 64
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life in other planets Some people think that the government is wasting money and they should spend more money addressing the public problems To what extent do you agree 81
- The majority of news being reported is bad news such as wars famines accidents and crimes Why do you think that is Do you think the news should be a balance of both good news and bad news 61
- Children who start reading earlier in life, perform better later on in their school studies.How important are early reading skills in a child´s academic performance?What are preschool factors influence a child´s later academic achievements? 84
- Planting trees is very important for the environment Some people say trees should be planted in the vacant areas of cities and towns while other says housing facilities should be built instead Do you agree or disagee 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, while, except for, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60909090909 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7299078179 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3871759732 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.4 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169920799613 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666129742054 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436030911283 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104338201712 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212273356328 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.