The graph below shows the population figures for different types of turtles in India from 1980 to 2012.
The given line graph details the change in the growth pattern of four types of turtles: Leatherback, Green, All species, and Olive ridley turtles in India over a period of 32 years from 1980 to 2012.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that among all the categories which originated at the same value, showed a different growth behavior over time. A reverse trend can be witnessed in the case of Leatherback and olive ridley, while the other two represent a moderately similar growth trend.
According to the given illustration, about 100 turtles of each type emerged out in 1980. With the passing time, the Leatherback and Ridley touched a common value of 110 in 1986. Thereafter, both experienced an opposite pattern, the latter grew dramatically to a peak value of 130 before slipping down by 10 in 2012. In contrast, the former plummeted to just 60 after facing a few fluctuations by the end of the period.
On the other hand, despite showing an initial contrasting trend, the other two types grew moderately at the same pace during the last two decades. However, all species led the green turtle's number(100) by 10 in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-05 | KayVu | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | GREgirl | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | jessie_12345 | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-22 | vdrobny | 87 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | buimai1412003 | view |
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 84
- The graph below shows tourism statistics among Venezuelan students from 2011 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The chart describes the amount spent on consumer goods in sterling pounds by the given list of countries on different goods
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 59
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93908629442 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68366181993 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634517766497 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.044089513 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212328395816 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772774936147 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780178853061 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128727994707 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697050809588 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.