The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in 3 different countries.
The line graph compares the percentage of elder people who were 65 years old and over in Japan, Sweden, and the USA over a century from 1940.
Overall, the figures for all countries surveyed experience upward tendencies over the period shown. It is clear that Sweden has the most significant change in its aging population.
In the year 1940, nearly 10% of the total American population was elderly people aged over 65, while the respective figures for Japan and Sweden were slightly lower, at about 5% and 7%. Over the following 70 years, the percentage of 65 and over 65 years old residents in Sweden surpassed that of the US and became the nation had the highest level of the aging population. The American elderly proportion, meanwhile, the Japanese aging population remained at the same number as that in 2000 despite a small drop by around 2% during the first 45 years.
In 2040, the population aged 65 and over is predicted to account for approximately 28% of Japanese, compared to some 25% of Swedish and 24% of Americans.
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 78
- Some people think that mental strength is the most important factor for success in sports However some others believe that it is more important to have strong and fit people Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77653631285 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59799962901 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1058218955 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292963418766 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132355455191 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568837579262 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174586820431 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419540172047 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.