The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The line graph compares the percentage of people aged 65 and over between Sweden, USA and Japan from 1940 to 2040.
It is evident that there was a continual increase in the proportion of elderly people in three countries in the period of 100 years. The figure of Japan is expected to change dramatically in the future.
In the beginning of the period, 1940, around 9% of USA population were aged 65 and more. The figures of Japan and Sweden were 7% and 5%. The proportion of elderly population in USA and Sweden rose gradually in next 60 years of 20th century, reaching around 15% in 2000. By contrast, Japanese's over labor age population remained stable below 5% until the early 2000s.
Looking into the future, the population aged 65 and over of USA and Sweden will increase slightly, at about 25% and 23% respectively, lower than one of Japan. Because the biggest growth was seen in the percentage of elderly people is predicted for Japan, with a jump over 15% in just 10 years from 2030 to 2040. By 2014, it will be estimated that the proportion of Japanese elderly people will reach about 27%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Sakil | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | ahmadrava88 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- We can not help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 56
- The table below gives information on households with a regular use of car in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 Write a report for a lecturer describing the information shown below Make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph shows the hours spent in different study methods during a two years course. 78
- The graph shows the average annual expenditure on cell phone and residential phone services. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65306122449 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47780652954 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545918367347 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9210848883 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 5.23603664747 8% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287573090027 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110290352211 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968041107338 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185866730866 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954829450358 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.