the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport

Essay topics:

the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport

The given statistical line chart illustrates how much goods being distributed in the UK by four distinct transportation systems in four-year intervals, starting from 1974.
Overall, road and water transportations seemed to be the most popular modes for delivering goods throughout the period as they showed an upward trend. It is worth mentioning that rail and pipeline transportations were less preferrable.
A quick glance at the two first transport systems reveals that the number of commodities transported in the UK had its starting point at around 70 million tones. Then, this figure showed a rapid growth to approximately 100 million tones at the end of the period. Additionally, the amount of goods shipped by water transportation began at 40 million tones. Subsequently, it witnessed a sudden increase to over 50 million tones in 1982 before falling gradually to 50 million tones in 1998.
Turning to the other sets of data, the quantities of goods transported by rail transportation started at 40 million tones. Then, it is recorded for this figure to experience a fluctuation throughout the years to reach just over 40 million tones in the end. Conversely, pipeline transportation was less popular to start at roughly 5 million tones. After that, a constant increase to over 20 million tones was reported in terms of goods delivery in 2002.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-12 nobitaa 73 view
2024-07-12 nobitaa 73 view
2024-06-21 unstoppable 73 view
2024-03-03 Sang Sang Sang 73 view
2024-03-03 Sang Sang Sang 73 view
Essays by user nguyen thanh sang :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... statistical line chart illustrates how much goods being distributed in the UK by fo...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19634703196 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13865747461 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570776255708 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7821684927 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.454545455 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26456714977 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109673897316 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786128737986 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17920417095 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404295248554 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.