The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2022 by four different modes of transport

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2022 by four different modes of transport.

The given line graph illustrates the number of products transferred within the UK from 1974 to 2022 by four various forms of transportation.
Overall, the quantities of products by all the four types of transport increased. It is also noticeable that the products were transported by road the most, and through the pipelines the least.
In the year 1974, the quantity of goods moved by road was around 70 tons, being in the top position. The number of goods transferred through the pipelines was about one-seventh of that number, standing in the lowest position. The quantities of the products transported by the 2 remaining modes were similar, at around 40 tons. From 1978 to 1994, the products through the pipelines rose steadily to approximately over 20 tons. The products shifted by waterways also experienced a stable rise, but stayed the same between 1986 and 1990, then fell slightly to about under 60 tons in 1994. The goods by road and rail had the opposite patterns over these years.
From 1998 to 2002, the products via all of the modes of transport saw a rise, except for the pipelines. The number of goods by road went up minimally, reaching about under 100 tons as the highest figure. The number of goods by water and rail were about three fifths and two fifths of that figure respectively. The number of the pipeline products remained unchanged, at around 21 tons as the lowest figure.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-23 nguyendangquang.aspect 73 view
Essays by user nguyendangquan… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
.... From 1998 to 2002, the products via all of the modes of transport saw a rise, except f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...two fifths of that figure respectively. The number of the pipeline products remaine...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83402489627 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66251046325 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502074688797 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4417721246 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.6153846154 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.69230769231 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22398772518 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839247730104 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717187020615 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152428316231 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422368248718 0.0819641961636 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.