The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. . Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the goods transportation in the UK by four different modes from 1974 to 2002.
At first glance, it was evident that most of the goods were transported by road in this aforesaid period. In 1974, it was around 70 million tonnes then it had been increased dramatically and reach a peak at almost 100 million tonnes in 2002. The usage of the pipeline was the least. In 1974, only 5 million tonnes of goods were transported by pipeline. Furthermore, it had surged gradually since 1978.
As can be seen, both water and rail had met the same million tonnes of goods in 1978. In addition, the transportation of water had suddenly grown between 1978 and 1982. However, it had remained steady and shown a downward trend in 1911. Moreover, there was an obvious fluctuation in the rail mode. it had reached the lowest point in 1994 and the highest point in 2002.
To sum up, the usage of road transportation was the most in this 28-year period. Every of the transportation had enhanced, expect the rail.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-17 | Jasmineeee | 67 | view |
| 2014-12-06 | rajbirm788@gmail.com | 60 | view |
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 71
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 56
- The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sector's contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
The line graph illustrates the goods transportation in the UK by four differ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...n obvious fluctuation in the rail mode. it had reached the lowest point in 1994 an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, then, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74444444444 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72360509093 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8807808245 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.6923076923 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.8461538462 22.9334400587 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206155194338 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824830040172 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105714606508 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176208024241 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136001508367 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.62 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.