The graph show the annual income of language related jobs in US dollars in five cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main points and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph show the annual income of language-related jobs in US dollars in five cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main points and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart provides information on the amount of income generated per year by interpreters, translators and language teachers in five different cities. The unit is measured in US dollars.

Interpreters earn the most in Toronto, at $80,000, followed closely by those in Munich with around $75,000. While Paris and Dubai rank next with about $65,000 and $60,000, Mexico comes nowhere near the others, at just under $20,000.

When it comes to translators, they make pretty much the same amount in Toronto, Munich and Paris, at $65,000 each. Dubai ranks second with $50,000, but Mexican translators generate the least again, at slightly under $20,000.

As for language teachers, the disparity in income per year between cities grows larger. Those in Toronto top the chart by making approximately $65,000, which is $5,000 more compared to the figures for Munich and Dubai. Teachers in Paris, meanwhile, earn far less than the above three, at $45,000, whereas those in Mexico close the list making more than twice as less than those in Paris.

Overall, in each of the cities given, there is a small difference between the incomes of people doing these language-related jobs, with the most significant one being noted in Paris. It is also apparent that the incomes in Munich and Toronto are generally the highest, whereas in Mexico they are the lowest.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-23 lee giang 78 view
2023-11-23 lee giang 61 view
Essays by user lee giang :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... by making approximately 5,000, which is ,000 more compared to the figures for Mun...
^^
Line 9, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...se in Paris. Overall, in each of the cities given, there is a small difference betw...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, whereas, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04054054054 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49922072101 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576576576577 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2077833791 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.727272727 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0960315022231 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465134993 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447595151958 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662310258428 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522971113239 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... by making approximately 5,000, which is ,000 more compared to the figures for Mun...
^^
Line 9, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...se in Paris. Overall, in each of the cities given, there is a small difference betw...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, whereas, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04054054054 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49922072101 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576576576577 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2077833791 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.727272727 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0960315022231 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465134993 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447595151958 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662310258428 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522971113239 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.