The bar chart above depicts the gender proportion of academic staff members among 7 different faculties in a university in 2012. In general, majors such as education and engineering are more gender dominant than arts, business, law, medicine, and science faculties.
In 2012, the number of male academic staff members in the engineering faculty was almost four times higher than the female members which contributed less than 20 percent of total members. The opposite trend can be seen in the education faculty as more than 70 percent of staff members were female. Besides, the science and business faculties also had gender bias in terms of staff members but the bias was only twice as much in favor of male gender which was approximately 62 percent for the business faculty and 63% for the science faculty. The gender was almost equal with the bias rate less or equal than 20 percent in the remaining faculties in which the law faculty got the highest bias rate of 20% after that were arts and medicine faculty with the bias figure of around 5 and 2 percents respectively.
- Most people accept that we now live in globalized world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial To what extent is globalization a positive or negative development 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead 73
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 73
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and researchDisc 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the bar chart above depicts the gender prop...
^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gender bias in term of staff members but the bias was only twice as much in favor...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89673913043 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49104611113 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.2042134386 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.166666667 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2594720364 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14992127743 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972983708955 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1427451805 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100421677639 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.