The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The graph illustrates the number of people in the percentage who were able to own computers according to their education standards from 2002 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that computer ownership showed an upward trend throughout the given period. In a gap of every two years from 2002 till 2010, the percentage of people having computers observed a steady increase. An incline in ownership was noted according to the level of educational qualification with maximum computers owned by bachelor’s and postgraduate students. The least was by learners with no high school diploma.
On the one hand, computer ownership by students with no high school diploma was about 12% in 2002. Then, it rose to almost 35% owned by high school graduates in the same year. A continuous incline in was observed till the end of period. Approximately 52% of incomplete college goers and 68% of students having bachelor’s degree owned computers in 2002. Highest ownership of around 70% was seen among postgraduate degree scholars.
On the other hand, computer owned by high school students was about 40% in 2010. It was four times more than the rate seen in 2002. However, a continuous rise was noted among ownership till the end of given period. Abut 67% of high school graduates and 82% of incomplete college goers had access to computers. However, a significant upsurge in computer ownership was seen among students possessing Bachelors and postgraduate degree having approximately 89% and around 97% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | welly | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | sandeep kour | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | RahulM | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Murodjon Mamadjonov | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | marchjkd@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 word 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from this energy use. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 56
- Gaming is argued to have a bad influence on young children but some people think that it could have a positive effect on them as well Which view do you agree with Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 73
- The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Highest'.
Suggestion: The Highest
...'s degree owned computers in 2002. Highest ownership of around 70% was seen among ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17813765182 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93157668293 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477732793522 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 377.1 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0606709779 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2666666667 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4666666667 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73333333333 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193898971619 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743168440077 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651712601057 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152104496842 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479548228665 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.