The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60-64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The bar charts reveal changes in the proportion of the 60-64s in two genders who have jobs in four different countries in the two separate years, 1970 and 2000. Overall, there was a downward trend in both genders, among which males always dominated higher position compared with females during these years surveyed.
In 1970, the rate of working men and women in the USA outnumbered others, making up 86% and 78% respectively. This was closely followed by that of those in Indonesia, which male consists of 84% and female consist of 65%. The figure for men and women having jobs in the remaining countries was similar, standing at an average of 76% for the former and 60% for the latter.
After 30 years, the percentage of working males continued its highest figure among all, at 78% while that of females fell to 45%. A close value can be seen in the figure for Japan and Indonesia, in which 55% belonged to men and 62% belonged to women on average. There was a relatively large gap between the proportion of those in Belgium with the figure for males being approximately seven times compared with that for females.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-07-11 | hoanghihi1234 | 73 | view |
2021-12-23 | Geegeepay | 44 | view |
2021-12-23 | Geegeepay | 78 | view |
2021-09-11 | chungoclan2004 | view | |
2021-09-11 | chungoclan2004 | view |
- Some people say that it is possible for a county to be both economically successful and have a clean environment Others disagree Discuss both view and give your opinion
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- The pie charts show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005 100
- The chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010 73
- FEWER YOUNG PEOPLE DO FARMING WORK IN RURAL AREAS WHY SHOULD YOUNG PEOPLE ENCOURAGED TO DO FARMING WORK 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h females during these years surveyed. In 1970, the rate of working men and wom...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73979591837 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44742191108 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586734693878 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.4446661748 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11681042847 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531759433176 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546005807308 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839344008523 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344969057299 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.