The graphs below show the total percentage of films released and the total percentage of ticket sales in 1996 and 2006 in a country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The column charts compare how much of the film had been published, along with the tickets sales with four genres like drama, comedy, fantasy, and romance are happened for 10 years, from 1996 to 2006.
Overall, it can be seen that even though drama films are more produce than comedy, but it is still lower than comedy films. Whatever, nevertheless, the fantasy and romance types are also not preferred in the given years.
In terms of the highest categories, in 1996, drama films were produced at 26%, it continued upwards in 2006 with 35%. On the contrary to the comedy, it had just gone into by 10% in 2006. However, the figures are changed, drama films had not been the first option of viewers, what is mean that is the tickets have sold with its just roughly 16% from 1996 to 2000. Comparing the comedy, the revenues of its are over 20% in 1996 and reached the peak at nearly 25% in 2006.
On the other hand, fantasy and romance films seemed to not opt for watched, so that both of films have been under 20%, in which, fantasy had the proportions by 5% in the films released and Romance had been an almost similar number of films produced at 5%. Following this, the genre of fantasy saw a considerable plummet at 3%, after rising to 7% in 2006 with its tickets be sold. Eventually, Romance films had been declined viewers by nearly 2% in 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-04 | Raju godara | 67 | view |
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 82
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 78
- The diagram details the process of making clothes from plastic bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Nowadays people get information through the news but are uncertain about the truth of this news Should we believe the journalists what qualities should a good journalist or correspondent have 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, nevertheless, so, still, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20055410372 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0183005811 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12218920756 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545989761486 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271811247881 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777173556519 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343944096313 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.