The graphs below show unemployment rates and average earnings according to level of education.

IN DETAIL, THE DIAGRAM REPRESENTS A DECREASING TREND OF UNEMPLOYMENT WITH INCREASING EDUCATION LEVEL IN 2008 AND THE FIRST GRAPH SHOWS UNEMPLOYMENT RATE. STUDENT OF HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA HOLDER WAS HIGHEST JOBLESS PEOPLE WITH NUMBER OF 5.5% WHILE STUDENT WHO STUDIED IN SOME COLLEGE EXPERIENCED 4.2%. MOREOVER COLLEGE DEGREE HOLDERS COPED WITH 2.5% AND THOSE PEOPLE WHO HAD DEGREE OF GRADUATION HAD LEAST
PERCENTAGE OF UNEMPLOYMENT ONLY 1.2%.

WEEKLY EARNING VARIED SIGNIFICANTLY TO ACADEMIC LEVEL AND THE SECOND GRAPH DESCRIBES AVERAGE WEEKLY EARNING IN EACH CATEGORY. FURTHERMORE, HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA HOLDERS GOT $600 WEEKLY WHICH WAS SMALLEST SALARY ACCORDING TO OTHERS WHILE STUDENT OF SOME COLLEGE HAD RECEIVED AVERAGE EARN ABOUT $675. ON THE OTHER HAND, WHO HAVE COLLEGE DEGREE EARN $1.100 AND HIGHEST INCOME WAS MADE BY GRADUATE DEGREE HOLDERS $1.500.

OVERALL, IT IS CRYSTAL CLEAR THAT THOSE PEOPLE WHO HAD GRADUATE DEGREE EARNED BIGGEST PAYMENT WITH LEAST NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYMENT.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
IN DETAIL, THE DIAGRAM REPRESENTS A DEC...
^^^
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
IN DETAIL, THE DIAGRAM REPRESENTS A DECREASING TREND OF UNEMPLOYMENT WITH ...
^^
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'WAS the HIGHEST'.
Suggestion: WAS the HIGHEST
.... STUDENT OF HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA HOLDER WAS HIGHEST JOBLESS PEOPLE WITH NUMBER OF 5.5% WHIL...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: MOREOVER,
...UDIED IN SOME COLLEGE EXPERIENCED 4.2%. MOREOVER COLLEGE DEGREE HOLDERS COPED WITH 2.5% ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 395, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'HAD the LEAST'.
Suggestion: HAD the LEAST
...OSE PEOPLE WHO HAD DEGREE OF GRADUATION HAD LEAST PERCENTAGE OF UNEMPLOYMENT ONLY 1.2%. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...HOOL DIPLOMA HOLDERS GOT 00 WEEKLY WHICH WAS SMALLEST SALARY ACCORDING TO OTHERS ...
^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'WAS the SMALLEST'.
Suggestion: WAS the SMALLEST
...OL DIPLOMA HOLDERS GOT 00 WEEKLY WHICH WAS SMALLEST SALARY ACCORDING TO OTHERS WHILE STUDEN...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... COLLEGE HAD RECEIVED AVERAGE EARN ABOUT 75. ON THE OTHER HAND, WHO HAVE COLLEGE ...
^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...HAT THOSE PEOPLE WHO HAD GRADUATE DEGREE EARNED BIGGEST PAYMENT WITH LEAST NUMBER...
^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'WITH the LEAST'.
Suggestion: WITH the LEAST
...GRADUATE DEGREE EARNED BIGGEST PAYMENT WITH LEAST NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYMENT.
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51973684211 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54848245268 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611842105263 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.2022779697 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217493206782 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108062171146 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104856518482 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119098311996 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553381738148 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.