The graphs below show where people first got their news, both about the world and about local events, between 1987 and 1997.
Overall, it is clear that radio was the least popular media in both world news and local news in the UK from 1987 to 1997.
To begin with, in the source of world news in the UK, 65% of news source was depicted by audio-visual media in1987. Afterward, it experienced an irregular trend which had a slight dip at 60% in 1989. This trend remained steady for nearly 6 years and started declining from 70% in 1993 to 67% in 1997. The proportion of Newspaper ranked the second over the 10-year period, it begins at 25% and dropped slightly to 18% in 1994. Finally, it ended up with 20 percent in 1997. The radio fluctuated marginally between 9% and 15% over the decade.
Turning to the source for local news in the UK, there is a dramatic decrease recorded in the newspaper, dropping from 56% in 1987 to 40% in 1997. However, television demonstrated an inversely proportional trend, increasing rapidly from 19% in 1987 to 37% in 1997. This followed by radio with minimal change which decreased minimally from 12% in1987 to 11% in11%
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services- to the UK economy in the twentieth century. 73
- The table below shows the results of a survey of the average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten-year pollution monitoring program. Traffic calming was introduced in harper lane at the begging of 1999. 78
- Nowadays people prefer to shop in large supermarkets rather than nearby local shops Why do you think this happens Is this positive or a negative trend 65
- Some people think watching TV is bad for children while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children Discuss both views and give your own opinion 69
- Nowadays people prefer to shop in large supermarkets rather than nearby local shops. Why do you think this happens? Is this positive or a negative trend? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d minimally from 12% in1987 to 11% in11%
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, second, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.625 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52711547385 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2639346164 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156637412087 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631638186309 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686944744315 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136321645373 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690039689603 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.