Most of the urgent problems can only be solved with international cooperation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary settings, global cooperation is given paramount importance, and some are of the opinions that a majority of important issues can be resolved by international cooperation solely. Considering this situation, it is crucial to explore this from two perspectives.
To begin with, international aids provided by wealthy countries have some merits as it is a genius tool for holistic international development. To be specific, signing agreements on sharing advanced technological support is an effective and efficient way to solve some global matters. For example, global warming is a key issue in the world village, and this could put some human-beings endangered as some countries, which are under the sea level, could be vanished by raising sea. Therefore, tackling this problem requires each country to cooperate together to make a joint effort. Thus, this cooperation makes a contribution to solving global problems. Moreover, many developing countries suffering in poverty and hunger problems need financial and resourceful support, thereby providing food resource and financial support by wealthy countries can possibly resolve these problems. As a result, this is a pragmatic approach to take care of global problems.
On the other hand, there might be some potential drawbacks on global cooperation, since some problems cannot be only solved by international collaboration. To be precise, since there is no such thing as free lunch, many developed countries will ask some things for return as a matter of help. For instance, some developed countries provide military and financial support for many poor countries to help them rebuild their countries. It is this help that gives them audacity and bargaining power to develop their land resource and use on other political purposes. Hence, this is a disastrous repercussion on international collaboration. Besides, many aid-recipient countries may experience inside corruption such as bribery and political volatility, since these financial supports are not allocated properly. consequently, people who are in need will face worse situations.
To sum up, it is apparent that global support plays a pivotal role in resolving global environmental issues, and scarcity of resources. However, by no mean, should we turn a blind eye on the detrimental effects, such as corruption of recipient countries, and exploit of some developed countries. I strongly believe that international aids are not the best way of resolving certain situations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | Manideep Macherla | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | nguyenanhquan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | haveaniceday | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | haveaniceday | 61 | view |
- Most of the urgent problems can only be solved with international cooperation To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- It is more important for school student to learn about local history than the world history. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graphs below show where people first got their news both about the world and about local events between 1987 and 1997 63
- Nowadays people prefer to shop in large supermarkets rather than nearby local shops. Why do you think this happens? Is this positive or a negative trend? 70
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services- to the UK economy in the twentieth century. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 848, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
... financial support by wealthy countries can possibly resolve these problems. As a result, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 809, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...al supports are not allocated properly. consequently, people who are in need will face worse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2139.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59947643979 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1764154549 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4659050532 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.578947368 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1052631579 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26315789474 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123848339308 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418449754829 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055137214485 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732757122523 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351336127613 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.