The graphs give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the same years.
The charts show the trends in and the correlation between the possession of computers and the educational level of their owners over the span of eight years from 2002 to 2010.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is apparent that the number of computer owners had increased in general and by education degree in particular. This is especially striking in the percentage of colleges and universities graduates, who purchased a computer.
As for details, only 60% owned a computer in 2002, and this figure increased steadily nearly 5% per year, reaching a peak of about 80% by the end of the period.
The percentage of computer owners between those who had no high education was only 15% in 2002 and increased nearly three times by 2010 (over 40%). With the rise in educational level, the number of owners went up and surged 90% among college graduates (in 2010). At the same time the outliers were bachelors and postgraduates with record high percentage over 90% by the end of observation period.
- School administrators at an elementary school have recently decided to increase the amount of hours spent teaching kids about robotics computer programming and other elements of science and technology However they were forced to reduce the amount of hours 90
- The maps below show Pebbleton 20 years ago and today 78
- Computer games are a waste of time Do you agree or disagree 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Do you agree or disagree 90
- Living in large cities today poses many problems for people What are these problems Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 57, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...f computer owners between those who had no high education was only 15% in 2002 and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, as for, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88823529412 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76396110118 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.0999584449 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303927508557 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130911921226 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746069320314 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178740610334 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657064327864 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.