Ielts 7 test 2 writing task1.
The graph below shows consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph given below illustrates the intake of fish and some kinds of meat in a country of Europe between 1979 and 2004.
People consumed beef more than other type of meats described. The consumption of Fish was the least among all items in early 1980's. Overall, the consumption of different types of meat has decreased from 1979 to 2004 ,except Chicken consumption which rose gradually during the years. The consumption of fish, however, remained relatively stable during the 25 years.
The amount of Chicken consumed by a person per week has risen steadily. It was just less than 150 grams/ week in 1979.Over time it rose to around 250 grams/week in 2004.
Beef and lamb both were consumed in large quantities of 150 grams/week and above in early 1980's. Their consumption has decreased to around 150 grams/week or less in 2004.
The consumption of fish however remained most stable or to be precise, it has decreased around grams/week from 60 grams to 50 grams/week for an individual during the past quarter of century.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 67
- Pie charts shows water used in 6 different areas of world for different purposes. Summarise and highlight main points. 67
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Ielts 7 test 2 writing task1 The graph below shows consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of meat in a country of Europe between 1979 and 2004. People consumed beef m...
^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of meat has decreased from 1979 to 2004 ,except Chicken consumption which rose gr...
^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Over
... just less than 150 grams/ week in 1979.Over time it rose to around 250 grams/week i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...b both were consumed in large quantities of 150 grams/week and above in early 198...
^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...grams to 50 grams/week for an individual during the past quarter of century.
^^
Line 9, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...grams/week for an individual during the past quarter of century.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94285714286 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62094545957 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548571428571 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1143365893 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162536681269 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762556706408 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823589506875 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109835228687 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100491862087 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.