The information below gives details about
household income and spending on food and clothes
by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013.
The table shows total family income per household in a UK city in 2010 and
2013, together with specific expenditure on food and clothes. The pie chart
illustrates how spending on food and clothes was broken down into 5
categories.
Overall, it is clear that total income fell in 2013, whereas spending on food and
clothes increased from the 2010 figure. The proportion spent on fruits and
vegetables rose sharply in 2013.
Total household income saw a significant fall, from £29,000 in 2010 to £25,000
in 2013. Despite this overall decline, expenditure on food and clothes rose by
£1000, to reach £15,000 by 2013
Taking this expenditure on food and clothes, the proportion spent on clothes
decreased from 22% in 2010 to 12% in 2013. In terms of spending on food,
there was a notable increase in the figure for fruits and vegetables, from 20%
to 35%. The proportion spent on dairy products also rose, reaching 20% in
2013.
In contrast, while the percentage spent on other food and drink remained the
same at 18%, the figure for spending on meat and fish fell significantly from
25% in 2010 to 15% in 2013.
- Some people think that the qualities a person needs to become successful in today s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about tjis problem 56
- British cuisine composition as of entire caloric intake 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e per household in a UK city in 2010 and 2013, together with specific expenditure...
^^^
Line 2, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iture on food and clothes. The pie chart illustrates how spending on food and clo...
^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... food and clothes was broken down into 5 categories. Overall, it is clear that...
^^^
Line 6, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll in 2013, whereas spending on food and clothes increased from the 2010 figure. ...
^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gure. The proportion spent on fruits and vegetables rose sharply in 2013.\0 To...
^^^
Line 10, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt fall, from £29,000 in 2010 to £25,000 in 2013. Despite this overall decline, e...
^^^
Line 11, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... expenditure on food and clothes rose by £1000, to reach £15,000 by 2013 Taking ...
^^^
Line 13, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...clothes, the proportion spent on clothes decreased from 22% in 2010 to 12% in 201...
^^^
Line 14, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% in 2013. In terms of spending on food, there was a notable increase in the figu...
^^^
Line 15, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gure for fruits and vegetables, from 20% to 35%. The proportion spent on dairy pr...
^^^
Line 16, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...airy products also rose, reaching 20% in 2013. In contrast, while the percenta...
^^^
Line 19, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent on other food and drink remained the same at 18%, the figure for spending on ...
^^^
Line 20, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on meat and fish fell significantly from 25% in 2010 to 15% in 2013.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95336787565 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58188145389 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528497409326 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8399869236 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 3.83414634146 417% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 1.69756097561 766% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300726972979 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146536809421 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794747609474 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104486839626 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07463473916 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.