The information on consumer spending on 5 countries in 2002
The chart compares the proportion of consumption of five items in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002
In general, In five nations, people spent more money on Food/Drink/Tobacco than Clothing/Footwear and Leisure/Education.
In 2002, Food/Drink/Tobacco made the biggest contribution to the rate of expenditure in five countries with the highest usage were 28.91% and 32.14% in Ireland and Turkey. On the other hand, the figures for Clothing/Footwear were significant smaller in five countries, it was 9% in Italy and around 6% in other nations. In the same way Leisure/Education experienced the least number of spending with under 5% in terms of countries, with the lowest proportion was under 2% in Spain and the highest was 4.35% in Turkey
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-15 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts 84
- Should parks in city be replaced by different purposes. do you agree or disagree 78
- The land for parks is wasted and should be used for other purposes Do you agree or disagree 90
- The information on consumer spending on 5 countries in 2002 56
- Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002 In general, In five nations, people spen...
^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e same way Leisure/Education experienced the least number of spending with under ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, in general, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 637.0 965.302439024 66% => OK
No of words: 120.0 196.424390244 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30833333333 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30975091965 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.73934597668 2.65546596893 141% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591666666667 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 183.6 283.868780488 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.3616546352 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.25 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.75 5.23603664747 263% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0896368665531 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507814602219 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403546921993 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529657474707 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381893096715 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.