Internet Users as percentage of population
The line graph below illustrates the percentage of people in three different countries who uses Internet.
Actually, all people of time from 1999 to 2009 experienced an upward trend in three figures. In comparison with USA and Canada, population in Mexico, who uses internet, gradually increased, while other two trends witnessed noticeable growth in numbers.
Moving to a more detailed information, USA started from using more online network and stood at approximately one quarter. In contrast, 1999 hit the lowest point in Mexico at just under a 10 percent, which was followed by steady rise. At the same time, there were a sharp leap in the percentage of about 25 percent from one tenth to just under one third in Canada.
2002 saw some changes in the way of growth of numbers. There were dramatical climb in Canada. It consequently lead to USA, which used to have the highest point before, become second. Following this increasement, Canada hit the highest point at 100 percent, while USA stood at four fifths. However, Mexico's data is considered to be the lowest one at the end of whole period. THe number of internet users have risen to only two fifths of all population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-07 | Lê Vũ Anh | 20 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
- international migration in UK 56
- International migration in UK 56
- Internet Users as percentage of population 84
- International migration in UK 11
- Scientists believe that people ruin their health by eating junk food. Some people think that the best way to prevent from eating junk food is to educate them, while others believe that this wont. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below illustrates the percentage of peo...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...ed an upward trend in three figures. In comparison with USA and Canada, population in Mexi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...atical climb in Canada. It consequently lead to USA, which used to have the highest ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, however, if, second, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.915 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64752242672 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3221389578 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9166666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143873784325 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473969332012 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732236708389 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942733521602 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531011166746 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.