The line chart below gives information about the percentage of women aged 15 to 64 in employment between 2003 and 2009
The line chart illustrates the proportion of female employee aging from 15 to 64 in 5 countries over 6 -year period fom 2003 to 2009.
Overall, it is evident that Iceland remained the highest rate of women in this age group over the period shown, despite a mild decline. In addition, while Canada, Germany and Chile experienced a slight increase in this figure, the opposite trends were witnessed in the remaining categories.
Turning into detail, in 2003, nearly 80% of total Iceland women aging from 15 to 64 was working women, followed by Canada and Germany, with approximately 69% and 58%, respectively. In 4 years later, while Iceland still stabilized at about 80% in 2007, this figure for Canada and Germany slightly increased. Throughout the rest of the period, the number of Iceland decreased to 79% while the two countries continued upward trends, resulting in the final figures of 70% and over 65% respectively.
Regarding to the other categories, in 2003, in comparison to Turkey, which made up only 25% working women aging from 15 to 64, this figure for Chile was slightly higher, with over 35%. From 2003 to 2009, while there was a minimal rise in the number of Chile to over 40%, Turkey experienced a marginal drop, with the final number of 23%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-30 | Hoàng Ngọc Anh | 72 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK city between 1989 and 2009 95
- The line chart below gives information about the percentage of women aged 15 to 64 in employment between 2003 and 2009 72
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 77
- The chart below shows the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000and 2010 with the projected sales for 2020 77
- The two maps below show road acess to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by seclecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line chart illustrates the proportio...
^^^
Line 6, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rends, resulting in the final figures of 70% and over 65% respectively. Regard...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90277777778 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60870900146 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578703703704 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.301019291 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 132.375 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203556086011 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966869876564 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931172650229 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14551068962 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863651538146 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.