the line chart shows the percentage of internet users in 3 countries between 1999 and 2009
The given chart compares the percentage of internet users based on the amount of population between three countries, namely USA, Canada and Mexico from 1999 to 2009. Overall, it can be clearly seen that a constant increase was seen in the percentage of internet users in the mentioned period. Besides, Canada witnessed the highest percentage of internet enjoyer at the end of this period.
Standing at 25 percent as the highest proportion in 1999, the percentage of internet users in USA saw a noticeable and constant fluctuation during two decades to 75 percent in the final year. Besides, ranked at the second position at the beginning, there was an unstoppable increase in the proportion of internet users in Canada from 10 percent and it reached the peak of 100 percent at the end of this period.
It is worth of note that standing as the lowest percentage at the beginning of the period, the proportion of internet users in Mexico witnessed a slight go up during 20 years, from under 5 percent to around 40 percent in 2009
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-16 | tieuchanchau01230 | view | |
| 2022-09-27 | lattethuc | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-06 | luckydough55 | 52 | view |
| 2021-05-24 | Ester Nguyễn | 70 | view |
| 2021-02-25 | Manvir singh | view |
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 88
- Stress is now a major problem in many countries around the world What are some of the factors in modern society that cause this stress and how can we reduce it 70
- Do the advantages of having closed circuit television outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- the line chart shows the percentage of internet users in 3 countries between 1999 and 2009 67
- The pie charts and the table show the types of living accommodation occupied by 25-year-olds in London during yhr 1990s and 2010s and the availability of different types of accommodation in London during the same two periods. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81460674157 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67960449836 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494382022472 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.1805044483 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.833333333 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269701816778 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157608973444 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919312334878 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199191587168 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941093012947 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.