The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented line graph compares the number of people who visited three museums, British museum, Science museum, Natural History museum in London from June to September in 2013.
It can be seen from the graph that more people visited British museum than other museums although it had a fluctuation during four months. In addition, number of visitors per month in Science museum were the least with around 400 thousand in whole period.
At the beginning of the period, the British museum remained the most popular among other museums and in July, it reached a peak with 750000 people. However, the Science and Natural History museums decreased to approximately 400000 visitors and it was nearly half of the British museum visitors.
The number of people visiting British museum dropped suddenly by 250000. But from august to september there was a slight increase in visitors. Similarly, people who were interested in science and natural history increased gradually till september.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-15 | tegarangkasa | 68 | view |
| 2021-06-20 | Davletova_U | view | |
| 2021-04-04 | akbarshoh | 81 | view |
| 2020-04-30 | chickennoodlesoup_1999 | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-30 | chickennoodlesoup_1999 | 73 | view |
- The line graphs below show the production and demand for steel in million tones in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 82
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Australia
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Australia
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, similarly, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20382165605 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35868395414 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535031847134 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 157.0 22.4926829268 698% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 817.0 112.824112599 724% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 157.0 22.9334400587 685% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 36.0 5.23603664747 688% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189284175526 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189284175526 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140605259395 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757889315677 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 81.6 13.2329268293 617% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -87.88 61.2550243902 -143% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 64.5 10.3012195122 626% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.06 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.44 8.06136585366 179% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 51.0 11.4329268293 446% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 64.8 10.9970731707 589% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 65.0 11.0658536585 587% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.