The line graph depicts the number of burglaries per thousand in Great Britain, Greece, Spain, and Norway from 2000 to 2009.
The line graph depicts the number of burglaries per thousand in Great Britain, Greece, Spain, and Norway from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, the highest number of burglaries happened in Great Britain. There was an increase in burglaries in Greece, while the figures went down in Spain at the recorded time and it stayed relatively stable in Norway.
In 2000, the number of burglaries fluctuated in Great Britain from around 15,000 to about 20000, and the figures peaked at 20,000 in 2002 and 2006, finally dropped to 15,000 in 2009. The trend was similar in Spain. The figures peaked at nearly 7,00 in 2005, before steadily decreasing to just below 5,000 in 2009.
Greece was the only country were burglaries increased over time, it started nearly at 7,00 in 2000 and stayed steady for next four years, finally the numbers went up gradually to just below 15,000 becoming the second highest. Greece and Norway started almost at the same point while the figures for Norway fluctuated before slightly dropped to just above 5,000 in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-25 | SaranyaJeevesh | 67 | view |
- People born today can expect to live longer than people in previous generations. What are some of the positive and negative implications of this phenomenon?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experienc 56
- People should choose their course of study not on the basis of their own interests, but based on the kinds of jobs they can get.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- The line graph depicts the number of burglaries per thousand in Great Britain, Greece, Spain, and Norway from 2000 to 2009. 67
- The table illustrates the social and economic statistics for Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1995 by the United Nations. 73
- ake a look at the graphic and complete the task The table and chart show data from a survey of library users Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97126436782 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25006422304 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9211479082 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4258279434 0.215688989381 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.233483051047 0.103423049105 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.297179682227 0.0843802449381 352% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.387548570004 0.15604864568 248% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.357553247922 0.0819641961636 436% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.