The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000

Essay topics:

The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000.

The given line graph sheds lights on the percentage of total spending on five different categories in a European nation in the 40-year period, namely food, leisure purpose, clothes, transportation and energy consumption.
As can be seen from the graph, all mentioned expenditure sources exhibited downturn patterns during the given period with transportation was the only exception. Additionally, the consumption of energy accounted for the least proportion.
Considering the figures for Food, commencing the period at roughly 35%, it was then on a sharp plummet to only 14% in 2000. Leisure activity expenditure also bore some resemblance to that of Food, with a steady decline from 19% to around 11% at the end of the mentioned period.
What is worth noticeable is the adverse tendency of citizen’s spending for transporting purpose, made up just 9% in 1960. The data was then on a sharp growth, beating Clothes section in 1965, surpassing Leisure in 1989 prior to exceeding the Food category to gain the first position in 2000. Considering the same period of time, it was shown that people have the tendency to spend less on Fuel and Clothing, which was responsible for 3% and 5% of their total expenditure in 2000 respectively.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-10 taocute.s1 view
2022-09-25 manhabcd 78 view
2022-07-26 nhattram39 89 view
2022-07-25 nhattram39 89 view
2022-07-25 nhattram39 89 view
Essays by user nhattram39 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... position in 2000. Considering the same period of time, it was shown that people have the tend...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12376237624 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96949246529 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1376792955 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.375 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141923640319 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564902061553 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404766419491 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855832999324 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345784910645 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.