Line graph (The percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources: TV, Radio, Newspaper, Internet).
The graph illustrates the proportion of inhabitants getting instant access to relevant news from 4 categories, including television, radio, newspapers, and the Internet between 1995 and the expected 2025.
In general, it is expected that almost three sources of information would undergo a dramatic decrease when reaching 2025. In contrast, the Internet appeared at its lowest point in 1995, then witnessed a drastic rocket to take the lead in 2025.
Looking at the figure in 1995, the percentage of citizens who preferred to get information from the telly was nearly 70%, making it become the most dominant wealth of source before experiencing a downward trend in 2000. After that, the proportion of people watching TV gained popularity again to increase lightly before dropping to around 20% and is expected at 50% in 2025. On the contrary, the Internet was first on air in 1995 and rose gradually until 2000. It is noticeable that the ratio of people accessed to the Internet grew swiftly as a rocket to reach approximately a third in 2010. This figure continued rising throughout the mentioned period and is anticipated to stand over 55% in 2025.
Meanwhile, the percentage of people getting news from the newspapers and radio relatively fluctuated around 57% and 52% in 1995. Then, there was a significant plummet for both sources, with newspaper and radio figures are forecasted to be halved in 2025.
- Topic It s true that people don t have time to cook anymore 89
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- The graph shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by car bus and train between 1970 and 2030 84
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades Although some of these changes have been negative the overall effect of this technology has been positive What are your opinions on this 84
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, then, third, while, in contrast, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13852813853 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8073784991 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601731601732 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8527288903 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.7 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306303996915 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107104969509 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921727664546 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181028909048 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080465690354 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.