The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions which are Art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier and Festival in Brighton, over a thirty-year period from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that percentage of tourists fluctuated in four attraction groups significantly between 1980 and 2010. As can be seen, Pavilion experienced the highest fluctuation and only the Art Gallery witnessed a considerable decrease in the percentage of tourists in four attraction groups in Brighton.
Over thirty years, there was a steady increase in visitors to Pier from 10% to over 20%. Percentage of visitors to Pavilion hit a peak at nearly 50% in 1995 and then decreased to 30% in 2010. Besides, The number of people who visited Festival remained at about 30% over the time period.
Finally, There is a quick rise to nearly 40% in the percentage of visitors to Art Gallery in 1985. It dramatically fell down to 10% and were the least percentage of tourists who visited to Brighton attractions
- The diagram below shows the number of landline telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five year period Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 79
- The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
- The graph below shows tourism statistics among Venezuelan students from 2011 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage participation of men in senior development in three companies between 1980 and the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09411764706 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92652822881 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7828448139 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414200134363 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176193703235 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157795083311 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268957004583 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150338579399 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.