The line graph shows the percentages of Australian exports with four countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
You should write at least 150 words.
The line diagram illustrates the data on the commodities exported from Australia to four different countries including Japan, the US, China, and India over a 22 year period, starting from 1990.
Overall, it can be observed that the percentage of goods exported from Australia to China and India exhibited upward trends whereas China displayed the most significant growth over the period. However, exports to the remaining two countries, Japan and the US declined over 22 year period.
Examining the dataset that increased in more detail, it is clear that China and India started at 2.5% of products imported from Australia in 1990. While China reached 5% in 2000, India remained the same. In 2012, China and India reached 28% and 5% respectively where China showed a significant escalation among the all countries in the graph.
Turning to the dataset that decreased, it is evident that Japan started from 26% in 1990, which is the highest starting in the graph. After experiencing a decline over the period, it reached 16% in 2012. Australia exported 12% of products in The US in 1990. After a sudden drop in 1995 at 8%, it climbed again to 12% in 2000. Thereafter it displayed a downward trend and reached 7% in 2012
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-18 | Zahid6400 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-22 | nijam | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | maiphuonganh | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan52 | 67 | view |
- The pictures below shows the process of making smoked fish Write a report for a university lecture describing the process below 61
- Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public 67
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 75
- An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage of the natural environment What are the causes and possible solutions 73
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to w 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90338164251 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61981883387 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51690821256 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7657071732 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2727272727 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0895329764227 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358322449273 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326057161396 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0618450616483 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175394461883 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.