Living in a country when you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
it is often said that living in a foreign country where you speak with non-local language would make communication problems, as well as practical problem. I completely agree with this statement.
Firstly, it is undeniable that difficult to communicate would be the barrier of living in a foreign country. While a new immigrant may always participate some social activities which hold by government or community institution, to know more culture or ritual about the country, language barrier hinders the social interaction between local citizens and immigrant. No one would accommodate to speak foreign language, or even there are no people can understand that what are you talking about although you behave to join the society. For example, there are many immigrants who come from China, living in Hong Kong and speaking with Putonghua. Sometimes, the locals may not understand what they say. And it becomes a barrier for the immigrant who lives in a foreign country.
Secondly, it also can be the main reason that different language would let immigrant to be lone. As living for a long time, the immigrant, who speak with foreign language, could not meet a new friend who applicates with local language. We know that the interaction is communicating through by language, you cannot interact deeply with others by using body language, instead of language. The immigrant would lose their friends at his local country also since they have not faced with a long time.
To sum up, as the reason to communicate barrier and feel lonely, I entirely agree that living in a country who speak non-local language may cause social problems and practical problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-05 | harry0528 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-06 | cocococo123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-06 | Tinylavender | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls In the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development? 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is often said that living in a foreign ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, talking about, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11070110701 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7384201159 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531365313653 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5519906812 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.538461538 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272995873167 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978547685139 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851718705116 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194342251964 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077325330468 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.