Many people say that cooking and eating healthily is better for individuals’ health than consuming ready meals. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is appreciated that preparing and consuming healthy meals would bring more benefits to people’s health compared to having takeouts. From my perspective, I truly agree with this viewpoint. This essay will indicate some explanations for my verdict.
There are several drawbacks of takeaways in terms of food quality and the hygiene of the cooking process. Initially, regarding the adequacy in the nutrition of prepared food, as most ready meals usually contain high levels of added sugar and trans fat, the food is not at all nutritious and healthy. Consumers may consequently have excessive calorie intake and suffer from cardiovascular diseases or obesity. Besides, another overwhelming problem comes to kitchen sanitation. Most restaurants are advertised to have high standards of cooking hygiene, however, no commercial cooking process is flawless. This is derived from the fact that chefs have to prepare meals within large-scale settings for a long time, therefore hygienic mistakes are inevitable. Therefore, I think consuming ready meals is adverse for individuals’ health.
By contrast, cooking and eating healthily would be beneficial for the well-being of people as they can have control over their eating plan and food safety. To begin with, a person is able to follow a healthy regime with the right portions for every dish when cooking at home so that the nutritional value of the dishes can be altered in order to suit individuals’ needs. As a result, a healthy and balanced food intake can be achieved. Additionally, food quality is also a key advantage of home-cooked meals. This is mainly due to the fact that as people purchase food on their own, they would select the best nutritious ingredients available to meet their needs. So I believe that preparing and consuming healthy meals contribute significantly to people’s health.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned reasons, my verdict is that cooking and eating healthily is far better for individuals’ health than consuming ready meals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-26 | lennie.butera | 73 | view |
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not well managed What are the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that the benefit 89
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- As country develops a large population chooses to live individually or live in a small family unit Discuss the causes and its effects on society 73
- Many people say that cooking and eating healthily is better for individuals health than consuming ready meals To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, as for, i think, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 965.302439024 179% => OK
No of words: 319.0 196.424390244 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42946708464 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98854118692 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 106.607317073 171% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570532915361 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 283.868780488 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9029439755 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.882352941 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31475478015 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100113363083 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921882415708 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221462499813 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782190805348 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 40.7170731707 219% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.