The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015
Given are the two maps depicting the striking difference in the outlook of a ground floor in a university department during a 15-year phase, commencing from 2000.
Perceptibly, the dramatic change took most in the northern part with the appearance of some buildings and the removal of trees.
In 2000, the school area with trees to its east was located opposite a fork on the main road running through the area from southeast to west. There was a corridor connecting with the main entrance and dividing the university into two main parts in which two seminar rooms were placed on the left and on the right there was an office and a library next to another seminar room.
15 years later, a new car park was in existence to the east of the main entrance. When it comes to the university part, two new seminar rooms were constructed on each side of the corridor along with the extension in size of the office toward the library. Therefore, plants were removed to give space for a new building in which the IT center and the bigger library were connected by a small corridor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-30 | myduyen282 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | kevann | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | immtee | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-19 | suaadma34 | view |
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers Summarize the information by select 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the informat 84
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 11
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 67
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps depicting the striking dif...
^^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
... give space for a new building in which the IT center and the bigger library were con...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 335, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centers'?
Suggestion: centers
...pace for a new building in which the IT center and the bigger library were connected ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... building in which the IT center and the bigger library were connected by a small...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59895833333 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46762346836 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557291666667 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.1721754686 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.142857143 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119698941303 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594013545479 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899818989891 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947920166213 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105173953151 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.