the maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010
The pictures illustrate how the village called Stokeford had been renovated from 1930 to 2010
Overall, it is apparent that farmland accounted for most of the village as well as few houses were built in Stokeford in 1930. However, throughout a period of 80 years, this village became a more modernized and residential area
In 1930, most of the land in Stokeford was for the purpose of farming and there was a river called Stoke running through the village and crossed by a north situated to the north of it. In the middle of the map, there was a large house surrounded by gardens and adjacent to a primary school in the north. There were shops and a post office built nearby houses, which were opposite the primary school and separated by a road
By 2010, there had been many significant alterations taking place in this village, while the river Stoke, the bridge, and the post office remained unchanged. All of the farmland was removed in order to make more space for new houses. The central gardens and the large house were knocked down to make way for a retirement home, the primary school was expanded and shops were demolished. Remarkably was the number of houses, which increased considerably and were built alongside roads all over the village. There were also many shifts in the village's infrastructure when there were many new roads merging with the main one to the north along with a new square-shaped road which was added in the center of the site
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 78
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Because computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately learning a foreign language is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below gives information about U S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...and the post office remained unchanged. All of the farmland was removed in order to make m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 541, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'villages'' or 'village's'?
Suggestion: villages'; village's
...age. There were also many shifts in the villages infrastructure when there were many new...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72265625 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49109436743 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 379.8 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.9194761364 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.125 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166413170114 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730835970693 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101271753149 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151675642788 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091580043219 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.