The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day.
The two maps provide information about developments that have been developed on a university campus during 2010 and the present.
Overall, it is seen clearly from both maps that many new facilities had been constructed in the given period. And a new road was built in place of the restaurant.
To comments with, the building for student accommodation on the northwest side of the map expanded into two buildings for the same usage. Furthermore, university offices and a teaching block from both sides of the main road both had been transformed into the new science and art building respectively. Despite the lawn and seating area around the lake is removed, but the lake remained the same.
Moreover, students facilities and, shops, offices and others had been replaced the old student accommodation place on the right side on the road in the west. In addition, the restaurant and shops on the south side of the campus had been demolished. There were a road and a building for accommodation usage that had been constructed in that place.
- The bar chart shows men s and women s prize money at golf majors in 2010 90
- Some people think the typical teaching of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050 Do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows overweight men and women in Australia between 1980 and 2010 40
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a di erence To what extent do you agree or disagree 26
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...campus had been demolished. There were a road and a building for accommodation us...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98285714286 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82611726146 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531428571429 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5275821591 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8888888889 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17911841735 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796916341613 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987977749511 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13777129099 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118404603166 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.