Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
In the modern world, technology has become a dramatic movement and that has changed the way people communicate together. The development of technology has effected on human relationships and tend to be positive sides.
Technology started and burst widely over the world from the twentieth century. The important inventions to humanity such as mobile phone, the computer and internet, so on bringing people easy to interact with other. For example, in the past, people had to contact and keep in touch together by writing hand-letter that waste much time to receive the message and respond. However, nowadays, the development of technology helps people easily and rapidly interact with each other. Utimating the phone or accessing the internet which can communicate and retain the relationship together despite living far away in the hemisphere. In addition, in business, technology has become the essential tool, entrepreneurs retain their relationship with partners or colleagues by sent email or message. They also video call online to negotiate about the business.
People do not only keep their relationship but also make a lot of new friends on around the world. In the past, people can exchange their information, status, culture to international friends. Nonetheless, the development technology widespread help the citizen change their relationships. For instance, these days, people always use a phone and enter social networks like Facebook, Viber which interact with foreign friends on over the world. It is convenient to share their status, pictures about their culture, nation or whatever and whenever they want.
To sum up, the burst of technology has changed the way people connect with each other and relationship of humanity tend to be positive. Image without the technology, what would happen to the people and the world.
- the table below give information on consumer spending on different items in five countries in 2002 89
- the line graph indicates the values of Australia s trade with China Japan and the US from 2002 to 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main futures and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Computers do not help children learn more effectively On the contrary the use of computers has a negative effect on children s physical and mental development To what exten do you agree or disargee 82
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of studying abroad. 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, nonetheless, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 965.302439024 161% => OK
No of words: 288.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40277777778 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8562188486 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 106.607317073 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 283.868780488 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0884113904 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367600231811 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119122429529 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094676691688 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255153721183 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797652158155 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 40.7170731707 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.