the number of train passangers travelling in Sydney
The line graph gives data on the number of train commuters in Sydney from 1995 to 2004.
The total number of train users had a gradual increase from 1995 to 2004, while it hit its highest point in 2001. However, in 2002 and 2003, there was a drop in their numbers.
According to the figures, after the initial increase of around 10 millions from 1995 to 1996, the train system witnessed a short period of stability and the number of those who chose trains as a means of transport remained unchanged for a year. Before its considerable growth of nearly 40 millions and reaching its highest peak in 2001, it had risen gradually from approximately 206 to 280 millions from 1999 to 2000. There was a continuous rise before reaching its peak. However, the number of train commuters experienced a sharp decline for a next year. And after that for three consecutive years it did not have any marked changes; it fell slightly and then remain stable for a final year.
In conclusion, the number of train users had a considerable improvement from 1995 to 2004.
- The internet means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- some people believe that nature is more important than nurture to what extent do you agree 56
- The graph illustrates the number of new model cars produced from 2000 to 2002
- The internet means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- in order to study at university students are required to pay expensive tuition fees not all students can afford them so some people think that university education should be free for everyone to what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70967741935 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52422647041 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55376344086 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2773197525 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195865970944 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971232722529 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934297464804 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16136984146 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634388898303 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.