NUMBER OF VISITORS IN SOME CARIBBEAN ISLAND
The graph demonstrates the quantiity of visitors to a particular Caribbean island between 2012 and 2017 in three different lines: Visitors dtaying on cruise ships, on island and tthe total. Overall, there were many changes throughout the period.
The most striking point is that, despite many differences in visitors' choice of living places among the period, the total of them gradually increased and reached its peak of 3.5 millions in the end. At first, the number of visitors staying on iland was 0.75 millions, which was 0.5 millions higher than that of visitors staying on cruise ships. Additionally, after two years, it had risen to 1.5 millions, contributed ¾ to the total. Hence, it remained the same for three years and lost the higher position to the other category. Quantity of visitors staying on cruise ships, in contrast, had an unstable proccess in the first three years. After that, it had risen dramatically and took the bigger contribution of 2 millions in 2017
Briefly, although the number of visitors staying on island had always being the higher for the fisrt five years, the other category had had an noticeable rise in the last two years, taking the bigger contribution
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...he fisrt five years, the other category had had an noticeable rise in the last two year...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... five years, the other category had had an noticeable rise in the last two years, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, first, hence, if, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0351758794 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58230835817 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.0328876211 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225772744957 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087257957752 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989539720068 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172446587406 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067866569289 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.