Park Map

Essay topics:

Park Map

The given plans illustrates GRANGE PARK in 1920 when it was first constructed and current status of the park. When the park was renovated, some of the features in the park changed.

First of all, in 1920 park had two entrances as opposite to each other. There were four planks for sitting at the left side of the park, if you enter from the entrance of ELDON STREET. The big fountain was right in middle of the park and left from that fountain big stage for musicians was there. The stage was surrounded by seats and two rose gardens which were in the direction of both entrances. Another rose garden was at the right of ARNOLD AVENUE entrance. Furthermore, right next to this rose garden there was a pond which was used for watering the plants. In front of these rose garden and pond, one glasshouse was there. One more seats of plank was at the right corner near glasshouse.

Now, after the renovation in the park only one rose garden is kept which is at the left of ARNOLD AVENUE entrance. At the left side in place of four planks of seats, one rose garden and stage of musicians, Amphitheatre for concerts is constructed. The both entrances are kept same as before. The fountain was replaced by one rose garden and four planks of seats in middle of the park. Instead of glasshouse water feature is made and where the rose garden and pond was before, cafe and play area for children is constructed. In additional to this one car parking area is constructed right under the park and the entrance kept at right corner of the park.

In conclusion park is renovated in order to kept demand of today's generation.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-28 Kaishal Ozarker 67 view
Essays by user Kaishal Ozarker :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... the park. When the park was renovated, some of the features in the park changed. First ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this rose' or 'these rises', 'these roses'?
Suggestion: this rose; these rises; these roses
...ed for watering the plants. In front of these rose garden and pond, one glasshouse was the...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 7.0 314% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 292.0 196.424390244 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55479452055 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37638661856 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424657534247 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2527577094 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.2352941176 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1764705882 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.09268292683 367% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194314340169 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893487934415 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994594249831 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175940676045 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081326027229 0.0819641961636 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.