The percentage of female members of parliament in European countries from 2000 to 2012
The given line graph indicates the changes in the proportion of parliament members who were women in some countries in Europe over the years from 2000 to 2012.
Overall, it is outstanding that all five countries saw an upward trend in women’s positions over the period. It is also remarkable that Belgium was the country in which the percentage of parliament women participants experienced the most significant changes.
Looking at the graph in more details, German y stood at the highest data, at around 34%, and the lowest position belonged to the UK, at almost in 2000. Meanwhile, the figures for Italy, France and Belgium were 26%, 25% and 17% correspondingly, higher than the UK. It is significant noticing that in 2008, the percentages of France and Belgium were the same at approximately 29%.
From 2008 to 2012, women who were parliament participants in the UK grew to 27%, while the data for the UK reached a peak at the same statistic. As regards the women members of Italy, it became the country having the highest data compared with the others in 2012, at 39%. Whereas, both Germany and France’s governments witnessed an increase of the female which has seats in parliament, at 36% and 32% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | kashyap sahil | view | |
| 2023-04-11 | kashyap sahil | view | |
| 2022-12-26 | huyentrang17122003 | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Zhuyingdeng | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-06 | nguyenhnil | 84 | view |
- Organized tours to remote communities and other countries are increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 73
- The graph below gives information about U S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 67
- The percentage of female members of parliament in European countries from 2000 to 2012 84
- The bar chart shows the numbers of male and female research students six subjects at a US university in 2011 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents witnessed an increase of the female which has seats in parliament, at 36% an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, whereas, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92753623188 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85052811136 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570048309179 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.0369990113 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262161445917 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107112721675 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875165798316 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175303000635 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975604432082 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.