The pie chart below show the responses by teachers of foreign language in Britain to a survey concerning why their students are learning a foreign language. The first chart shows the main reason for learning a foreign language. The second chart show how m

The two pie charts depict the information about the major causes for learning international language and shows teachers reactions why learner's learn another language.

It is vividly seen that, in the first chart 33 per cent of traveling is most popular to learn international language, whereas in the second graph had experienced just three percent. Moreover, learning another language for buying property overseas 19%, whilist in the second graph approximately doubled with 34%. Furthermore, the people learning foreign language for social contacts 7% in the first chart, while in the second chart given twofold growth 15 percent.

Moving further, pupils learn international language to personal development in 7% according to teacher given report, whereas in the second chart decrease with 4%. Meanwhile, for the general interest in the both charts given students learn foreign language merely difference just 1%.

Overall, the highest percentage of the learn foreign language of travel in the first chart, whereas in the second graph for buying property overseas. Meanwhile, lowest proportion of pupils learning international language for general interest in both years.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for learning international language and shows teachers reactions why learners le...
^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xperienced just three percent. Moreover, learning another language for buying pro...
^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...econd chart decrease with 4%. Meanwhile, for the general interest in the both cha...
^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
.... Overall, the highest percentage of the learn foreign language of travel in the first...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the lowest'.
Suggestion: , the lowest
... for buying property overseas. Meanwhile, lowest proportion of pupils learning internati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for buying property overseas. Meanwhile, lowest proportion of pupils learning int...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68361581921 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74312258276 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536723163842 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.4757188388 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443623856991 0.215688989381 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213918938217 0.103423049105 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942735488654 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297203181584 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371409887951 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.