The pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000
The pie chart illustrate the two out numbering of using electricty in Australia and france among 1980 and 2000.
Overall; it's clear that most segnificant feature is Nuclear power highest category accounted 126 units in 2000.more over the highest majority of second chart was coal accounted by 25 section.
In stark contrast;the total general section in 2000 and 1980 would be coal.coal group adged by 25 units in the same period of 2000 and 1980 on the other hand oil is talling off by a category 25 quantity in 2000 and 1980 oil part was 20 units.
The chart indicates the difference between two charts by days gone until 2000.the total number of hydro power in 1980 was 5 unis on the other hand in 2000 it would be 2 value.Also;the Natural gas have the same period like hydro power.in 1980 hydro power was 25 value but in 2000 it's 2 units.chart figure one accounted by 90 units . Additionaly;chart out numbering two was 170 units.
- Should animals be used in testing new drugs and procedures Gives reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 61
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Recent figures show an increase in violent crime among youngsters under the age of 18 Some psychologists claim that the basic reason for this is that children these days are not getting the social and emotional learning they need from parents and teachers 67
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'section' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sections'.
Suggestion: sections
...f second chart was coal accounted by 25 section. In stark contrast;the total general...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
... other hand in 2000 it would be 2 value.Also;the Natural gas have the same period li...
^^^^
Line 10, column 176, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... other hand in 2000 it would be 2 value.Also;the Natural gas have the same period li...
^^^^
Line 10, column 330, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s.chart figure one accounted by 90 units . Additionaly;chart out numbering two was...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73939393939 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66589237319 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.2873338737 43.030603864 228% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.4 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25109359216 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153269631242 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864530423303 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177323880235 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786319853863 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'section' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sections'.
Suggestion: sections
...f second chart was coal accounted by 25 section. In stark contrast;the total general...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
... other hand in 2000 it would be 2 value.Also;the Natural gas have the same period li...
^^^^
Line 10, column 176, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... other hand in 2000 it would be 2 value.Also;the Natural gas have the same period li...
^^^^
Line 10, column 330, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s.chart figure one accounted by 90 units . Additionaly;chart out numbering two was...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73939393939 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66589237319 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.2873338737 43.030603864 228% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.4 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25109359216 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153269631242 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864530423303 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177323880235 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786319853863 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.