The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie chart explains the significant causes for decrease in production of farming lands globally. While, the tabular data provides information about land degradation in the North America, The Europe, The Oceania for the year 1990.
Overall, Most of the places were affected because of over-grazing. Around, one-fourth of crop lands of the Europe affected in 1990's. The Oceania witnesses zero over-cultivation problem among the three. North America accounts for only small fraction to the overall deforestation.
Firstly, The significant cause of land degradation is by over-grazing which makes about 35%. While, only 7% of farming was affected by other reasons. Finally, Over-cultivation and Grazing together affected the 58% of global cropping land.
It is observed that the 95% of Oceania encountered over-grazing. In the Europe, 9.8% of trees cut down,which is double the times the total land degraded by Norther america and it has only 0.2% of deforestation rate. Only, 5% of North America affected which is the least.
- The diagram shows the production of hydroelectricity 56
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from 78
- The charts show information concerning speed camera use together with statistics on road accidents for the city of Melbourne 75
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 78
- The charts show information concerning speed camera use together with statistics on road accidents for the city of Melbourne Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...th of crop lands of the Europe affected in 1990s. The Oceania witnesses zero over-cultiv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... by over-grazing which makes about 35%. While, only 7% of farming was affected by oth...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...g. In the Europe, 9.8% of trees cut down,which is double the times the total land degr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4875 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06183666285 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9448709715 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.1666666667 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3333333333 22.9334400587 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112731082499 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452709160838 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346024279088 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735988520726 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264950403455 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.97 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.