The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The given chart illustrates the proportion of four components which represented causes of degradation on worldwide agricultural land, while the given table reveals three regions, namely North America, Europe, and Oceania, affected by those causes during the 1990s.
As can be seen from the pie chart, the three main factors that conduct the increased production of land all over the world were over-grazing, over-cultivation, and deforestation which made up a quite similar percentage. The table shows also the proportion of land degraded by three factors mentioned above and the total land degraded in each region, in which Europe accounted for the highest value.
The over-grazing represented the largest reason which made the land to be less productive, with exactly 35 percent. The percentage of destruction of forest beings 30 percent was the second reason. Just a small percentage of the other factors (7%) contributed to the components of the chart.
From the table, we can see that the total land that was degraded in Europe during the 1990s reached the biggest value at 23 percent, which was approximately four times as much as that of North America (five percent). The deforestation and over-grazing seemed to be the major factors which resulted in land degradation in Europe and Oceania, respectively. However, the over-cultivation had no contribution to land degradation in Oceania.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ss productive, with exactly 35 percent. The percentage of destruction of forest bei...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, second, so, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34545454545 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10643161125 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559090909091 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1868414652 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.666666667 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196741720912 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777677603507 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544426645504 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125251296824 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551591252776 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.