The two given pie chart illustrate the percentage of money that was spent and received for children's charity located in the USA during a year.
It is clear that donated food was the strongest revenue resources. And, the highest percentage of expenditure belonged to some kind of program services.
There are a various sources that contributed for children's charity. Donated food was 86.6% which was the largest number when comparing with others. Community contributions occupied one tenth in total, 10.4% - to be precise. Children in this charity organisation was also supported from some program revenue about 0.2%. Investment incomes, government grants, other incomes were much more smaller about 0.2%, 0.2% and 0.4% respectively.
Expenditure was divided in three main activities. First, as mentioned above, the number of program service was 95.8%, which was on the top. Second, furdraising was 2.6%. Finally, management and general was just only 1.6%.
- The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050. Summarise the information. 73
- The given graphs represents number of students in uk from 1991 to 2001 and government expenditure and different family economic bakground. 73
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems...so who do u think Should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organisation or each individuals? 56
- Some parents believe that reading entertainment books is a waste of time. In their opinion, children should only read serious, educational books. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experience 56
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'source'?
Suggestion: source
...ogram services. There are a various sources that contributed for childrens charity....
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...also supported from some program revenue about 0.2%. Investment incomes, governme...
^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'smaller' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: smaller
...ernment grants, other incomes were much more smaller about 0.2%, 0.2% and 0.4% respectively....
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, second, so, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51351351351 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74367800943 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.722972972973 0.547539520022 132% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1075591557 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.0 112.824112599 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.3333333333 22.9334400587 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11916968809 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435208194808 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090376494794 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101100665404 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135871164758 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.79 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.