The pie charts and the table show the types of living accommodation occupied by 25 year olds in London during the 1990s and the 2010s and the availability of different types of accommodation in London during the same two periods

Essay topics:

The pie charts and the table show the types of living accommodation occupied by 25-year-olds in London during the 1990s and the 2010s, and the availability of different types of accommodation in London during the same two periods

The pie charts compare the accommodation preferences by 25 years old inhabitants in London in the 1990s and 2010s. The table illustrates the available prices for different living space. As can be seen, there is a big conversion from living with family to staying in shared house and flat, while, a significant reduction in cost is shown at 1-2 bedroom houses and 1-2 bedrooms flat.

it is clear-cut evidence that the percentage of young adults living with their parents have reduced dramatically to less than a quarter. On the other hand, sharing house and flat became popular trends in the 2010s, both standing at nearly one-third of the 25 years old population. Whilst, both single flat and house sustained a decrease in popularity.

From the table, it is evident that a big change occurred in the 1-2 bedroom house and flat pricing. The cost fell significantly from more than 30,000 to less than 15 grand. On the contrary, prices for 3-4 bedroom house and flat prices have increase slightly to 48,500 and 32,000 correspondingly

Votes
Average: 8.6 (8 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-12-04 congatrongbietnoi2222 67 view
2019-01-08 sapphireng 86 view
Essays by user sapphireng :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...edroom houses and 1-2 bedrooms flat. it is clear-cut evidence that the percenta...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, while, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98275862069 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73515522743 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1464486824 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145909582414 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764905613246 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12724082381 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10923556579 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109796378481 0.0819641961636 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.