The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the population of Yemen and Iitaly in 2000 and predictions for 2050 based on age proportion. As can be seen, the percentage of Yemen's young residents are much higher than the rate of the older population
In 2000, more than half of Yemen's population was younger than 15 years old.Furthermore, more than 46% of the population allocated for people from 15 to 59 years old.On the contrary, less than 4% of the residents was older than 60. In the same year, almost two-thirds of the population was from 15 to 59 years old, whilst, only 14% was younger than 15 years old. On the other hand, more than almost one-fourth of the population was oldsters.
The charts also give information on the projected percentage of different age groups in 2050. In this year, the proportion of 15 to 59 years old in Yemen will increase slightly to more than 57%, with that, the percentage of older people will rise to a mere amount of 5.7%. On the contrary, the proportion of aged people in Italy will experienced a growth to 42.3%
- The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25-year period from 1980 to 2005 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Success is often measured by wealth and material possessions. Do you think wealth is the best measure of success? What makes a successful person? 56
- In cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem. What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem? 67
- The pie charts and the table show the types of living accommodation occupied by 25 year olds in London during the 1990s and the 2010s and the availability of different types of accommodation in London during the same two periods 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er than the rate of the older population In 2000, more than half of Yemens popula...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...opulation was younger than 15 years old.Furthermore, more than 46% of the population alloca...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...ated for people from 15 to 59 years old.On the contrary, less than 4% of the resid...
^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...15 to 59 years old, whilst, only 14% was younger than 15 years old. On the other ...
^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roportion of 15 to 59 years old in Yemen will increase slightly to more than 57%,...
^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'experience'
Suggestion: experience
...proportion of aged people in Italy will experienced a growth to 42.3%
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, third, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64324324324 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66621861344 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.5476157726 43.030603864 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163991382312 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111581995371 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108114260578 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141388435366 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636993298625 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.