The pie charts below give information about world population in 1990 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of citizens of all over the world in the two yeas 1990 and 2000.
It is clearly seen that there was an increase in the number of people in the world. In addition, while Asia accounted for the largest proportion of world population, the most significant differences belonged to both Latin America and Africa.
In 1990, there were 1.6 billion residents living and 60% of that was Asian, which marked this area rank first out of all regions. While Europe including Russia followed Asia with the percentage of 25%, the figures for other parts in the world were hovering 4%.
In a subsequent century, Asia and Europe was still the first and second leading area in terms of world population although they experienced decreases, ending up with 54% and 14%, in order. Additionally, there were significant increases in the proportion of people living in Latin America and Africa, which almost tripled those of 1900, to 8% and 10% in 2000, respectively. In the meantime, while 6% of citizens in the world started to settle down in Middle East and North Africa, the figures for North America and others remained unchanged.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1890 and 2000. 78
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 67
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age. 78
- The pie charts below give information about world population in 1990 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9387755102 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58976697046 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.009820051 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102678502054 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505886990794 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515411199874 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807250798635 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608510777718 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.