The pie charts below illustrate aspects of trade between Vietnam and the United States in 1994 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pie charts below illustrate aspects of trade between Vietnam and the United States in 1994.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

These pie charts compare the amount of exports from Vietnam to the United States and vice versa in 1994. The units are measured in millions.

Regarding Vietnam, they mainly exported primary products, and made a revenue which equals to $52. Nearly three-fourths of the total exports came from coffee and fruit and vegetable which accounted for only $23 and $16, respectively. The less significant items were seafood, rice and garments contributed $4.4, $4.3 and $2, respectively. However, the remaining number came from other product ($2).

On the other hand, the United States tended to export industrial products compared to Vietnam, and their total revenue from it was $172. This country earned nearly $75 and about $31 by selling aircraft parts and machinery items, respectively. Other items brought only $35 to this country. The rest of the revenue gained by exporting fertilizer, cotton and cars, which constituted $16, $12, and $6 in turn.

Overall, over three times as much revenue was earned from exporting in the United States as that in Vietnam.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-06 Turonxoja 78 view
2020-10-04 Turonxoja 79 view
2019-07-31 subashtimalsina112 58 view
Essays by user Turonxoja :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rice and garments contributed .4, .3 and , respectively. However, the remaining nu...
^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...remaining number came from other product . On the other hand, the United States...
^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on and cars, which constituted 6, 2, and in turn. Overall, over three times a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15476190476 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68763669484 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636904761905 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7175030543 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.7272727273 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121193365382 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508535368343 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680997119815 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102111883492 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763209660433 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.